ITH Poker Forum

[mconstab]

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/22/sm ... es-326318/

[Willem]

My win rate at 6-max at $5/$10 and higher is actually just over 1BB/100. (over 24K hands). I can probably do better by playing more exploitative and good table selection. But I very much doubt I will be able to do better than 2BB/100. Maybe at a small site with many terrible players, and good table selection, and a decent rake structure, and rakeback.

But I actually quit 6-max, as HU is way more profitable for me.

[Willem]

My win rate at 6-max at $5/$10 and higher is actually just over 1BB/100. (over 24K hands). I can probably do better by playing more exploitative and good table selection. But I very much doubt I will be able to do better than 2BB/100. Maybe at a small site with many terrible players, and good table selection, and a decent rake structure, and rakeback.

But I actually quit 6-max, as HU is way more profitable for me.

I actually forget to include rakeback here. My win rate at 6-max is 1BB/100 without rakeback. When I include rakeback, I run a little over 2BB/100.

[mconstab]

Yea I've been considering whether or not 6max is worth the effort. My lifetime results for 5/10 are 1.52BB/100 over 53k hands excluding rakeback but after having a pretty big downswing I've basically broke even for something like the last 20k hands. Rakeback obviously pumps that winrate up. If only Party had rakeback, the regulars in their games are considerably poorer compared to the other main sites.

I'm not sure I want to learn a new game from scratch though.