100% / $500 + Free Gifts 33% RAKEBACK - US FRIENDLY!
ITH Poke Forum

ITH Poker Forum

The Friendliest Online Poker Community

Skip to content


Advanced search
  • Poker Forum

  • Rakeback

  • Dimat Poker Books

  • Party Poker Bonus

  • Cake Poker Bonus

  • PokerStars Bonus

  • Board index ‹ Poker Topics ‹ Poker Law/ Legal Issues
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

  • Announcements

US Friendly Poker Rooms

Lock Poker - 150% Bonus up to $750, Bonus Code LOCK150
Cake Poker - 110% Bonus up to $600, Bonus Code ITHFGO, plus $50 Amazon Gift Card through the ITH Free Gift Offer
Bovada Poker (formerly Bodog) - 100% Bonus up to $1000, no Bonus Code required. Accepts Visa credit cards for deposits and pays out via check. Also has a Sportsbook.

  • View unanswered posts • View active topics

Response from Georgia congressman

Moderator: Wynton

Post a reply
3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Response from Georgia congressman

Postby mchilger » May 28 2010

Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts on H.R. 4976, legislation that creates a framework for the Federal government to collect revenue on Internet gambling activity. It is good to hear from you.

As you know, on May 19, 2010, the Ways and Means Committee held a hearing to discuss scenarios for instituting a Federal tax on Internet gambling. During the hearing, Representative Jim McDermott (D-WA) testified about legislation he introduced, H.R. 4976, which outlines a tax regime assuming the legalization and regulation of Internet gambling.

While I recognize your interest in regulating Internet gambling activity, I have concerns that Congress is getting ahead of itself on this issue. Only four years ago, the House overwhelmingly passed, by a 317-93 margin, a bill that later became law to prohibit banks from completing unlawful Internet gambling transactions. Since so many questions remain about whether or not Internet gambling should be legal, I believe it is premature to explore ways to tax this activity that remains illegal. Furthermore, it is my belief that policies should be adopted when they embody positive public outcomes. In this instance, I fear that regulation may be expedited in a rush to generate more revenue to spend recklessly.

Again, thank you for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to call on me in the future if I may be of assistance. John Linder

Only four years ago, the House overwhelmingly passed, by a 317-93 margin, a bill that later became law to prohibit banks from completing unlawful Internet gambling transactions.


Politics is such BS. How can he even write something like this when he knows the vote on that bill was for Port Security and that the internet gambling was just a throw in.
"It's not about the hand you put your opponent on, it's about how you think he will play that hand."
User avatar
mchilger
ITH Founder and Poker Author
 
Posts: 6911
Joined: Jun 30 2003
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
  • E-mail mchilger
Top

Postby MXRider » May 28 2010

did you send a response of such a nature? I'd love to hear his reply to that.
MXRider
Slim Shady
 
Posts: 6247
Joined: Jul 19 2004
Location: Have it your way!
Top

Postby mchilger » May 29 2010

yes- we'll see what he says.

Matthew
"It's not about the hand you put your opponent on, it's about how you think he will play that hand."
User avatar
mchilger
ITH Founder and Poker Author
 
Posts: 6911
Joined: Jun 30 2003
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
  • E-mail mchilger
Top

Post a reply
3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Poker Law/ Legal Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours
  • News News
  • Site map Site map
  • SitemapIndex SitemapIndex
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Facebook connect for phpBB by SVmods.

phpBB SEO
Time : 0.101s | 12 Queries | GZIP : On
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
Advertisements by Advertisement Management