100% / $500 + Free Gifts 33% RAKEBACK - US FRIENDLY!
ITH Poke Forum

ITH Poker Forum

The Friendliest Online Poker Community

Skip to content


Advanced search
  • Poker Forum

  • Rakeback

  • Dimat Poker Books

  • Party Poker Bonus

  • Cake Poker Bonus

  • PokerStars Bonus

  • Board index ‹ Poker Strategy ‹ Limit Hold'em
  • Change font size
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

  • Announcements

US Friendly Poker Rooms

Lock Poker - 150% Bonus up to $750, Bonus Code LOCK150
Cake Poker - 110% Bonus up to $600, Bonus Code ITHFGO, plus $50 Amazon Gift Card through the ITH Free Gift Offer
Bovada Poker (formerly Bodog) - 100% Bonus up to $1000, no Bonus Code required. Accepts Visa credit cards for deposits and pays out via check. Also has a Sportsbook.

  • View unanswered posts • View active topics

QQ facing aggression

Moderator: jeffnc

Post a reply
23 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2

Previous

Re: QQ facing aggression

Postby meetpeter » Jan 24 2011

hey guys,
i have just joined and its interesting.
sound good to me!!!
meetpeter
meetpeter
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Jan 24 2011
  • E-mail meetpeter
Top

Re:

Postby jeffnc » Jan 25 2011

Icall wrote:I've said it before and I'll continue to say it. Stop posting the results, it adds NOTHING to the discussion how play a hand and negatively influences the responses you'll get.


I strongly disagree. If you have to look, it's not our fault - don't punish us :-)

The primary reason for posting results is that it shows what people are playing out there. Coming back later and posting the results doesn't work - the vast majority of the time people forget or don't have the history any more or are simply not motivated. Posting the results also creates a database of results that we can all learn from. It is very easy to avoid looking and it also should be easy for experienced players to avoid considering it even if they have looked.
User avatar
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite
 
Posts: 7621
Joined: Jan 13 2004
Location: NC, USA
Top

Re:

Postby jeffnc » Jan 25 2011

nsidestrate wrote:The funny thing is that what the other player held is almost irrelevant to the learning experience.


I also very much disagree with that, although I'm curious what you mean by "almost" :-)
User avatar
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite
 
Posts: 7621
Joined: Jan 13 2004
Location: NC, USA
Top

Re:

Postby jeffnc » Jan 25 2011

pdxjim2112 wrote:The crucial part that should give you pause Ohjay is this: how do you know if someone's advice is based on him/her seeing the results or not?


By the solidity of the analysis and the reputation and experience level of the writer. Those things dwarf anything else. If you have a post with the results given and answers by nside and bugs, and another post with no results and answers by a few guys with 6 posts each, is it a big surprise which advice I'll be listening to?
User avatar
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite
 
Posts: 7621
Joined: Jan 13 2004
Location: NC, USA
Top

Re:

Postby jeffnc » Jan 25 2011

Wynton wrote:Reading the results will not tell you whether your analysis is correct.


Actually, this is a fallacy and is probably the root of the controversy. It is actually the results which provide correct analysis (that combined with raw math, of course.) By showing the results, we get several benefits. One is we see trends in games over time, especially when key hands are posted in games that we don't often play, or stakes that we don't often play. This is a public forum, so the answers are not just for the OP. Another is that it's one more result that gets logged in our database that ultimately affects all the other analysis in hands that follow. It may seem like just one hand, but the hands that get posted tend to be the most important hands to study (we will certainly not post hands where we folded junk, for example.) We need a catalog of results from important hands.

And as I said before, coming back later to log them simply does not work.
User avatar
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite
 
Posts: 7621
Joined: Jan 13 2004
Location: NC, USA
Top

Re: QQ facing aggression

Postby jeffnc » Jan 25 2011

By the way, if you want to get this hand to showdown, I prefer raising the flop. Not only does it get you there cheaper when someone else obliges, it also more clearly defines when you're crushed (if you don't get a free card on the turn, for example, or get 3-bet on the flop.)
User avatar
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite
 
Posts: 7621
Joined: Jan 13 2004
Location: NC, USA
Top

Re: Re:

Postby nsidestrate » Jan 25 2011

jeffnc wrote:
nsidestrate wrote:The funny thing is that what the other player held is almost irrelevant to the learning experience.


I also very much disagree with that, although I'm curious what you mean by "almost" :-)


Given that I posted it six years ago, I'm not sure I can help you now.
User avatar
nsidestrate
The Shark
 
Posts: 26721
Joined: May 26 2004
Top

Re: QQ facing aggression

Postby jeffnc » Jan 25 2011

You know how it goes man - I get on one of these rolls some nights, and don't pay any attention at all to the dates. I've done this foolishness many times before :D :oops:
User avatar
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite
 
Posts: 7621
Joined: Jan 13 2004
Location: NC, USA
Top

Post a reply
23 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Limit Hold'em

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours
  • News News
  • Site map Site map
  • SitemapIndex SitemapIndex
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Facebook connect for phpBB by SVmods.

phpBB SEO
Time : 0.104s | 12 Queries | GZIP : On
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
Advertisements by Advertisement Management
cron