100% / $500 + Free Gifts 33% RAKEBACK - US FRIENDLY!
ITH Poke Forum

ITH Poker Forum

The Friendliest Online Poker Community

Skip to content


Advanced search
  • Poker Forum

  • Rakeback

  • Dimat Poker Books

  • Party Poker Bonus

  • Cake Poker Bonus

  • PokerStars Bonus

  • Board index ‹ Poker Strategy ‹ Limit Hold'em
  • Change font size
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

  • Announcements

US Friendly Poker Rooms

Lock Poker - 150% Bonus up to $750, Bonus Code LOCK150
Cake Poker - 110% Bonus up to $600, Bonus Code ITHFGO, plus $50 Amazon Gift Card through the ITH Free Gift Offer
Bovada Poker (formerly Bodog) - 100% Bonus up to $1000, no Bonus Code required. Accepts Visa credit cards for deposits and pays out via check. Also has a Sportsbook.

  • View unanswered posts • View active topics

Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Moderator: jeffnc

Post a reply
10 posts • Page 1 of 1

Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby woodyman4916 » Apr 22 2011

After fighting with the Russian TAGs and 15/12 BOTs on Stars for 80k hands at .5/1 and 1/2, I find myself having to make a big adjustment to Lock Poker. Any obvious adjustments? I find myself lost. 5 limpers per pot! Hell open limping at most Stars tables was exstinct. Should I narrow my MP PFR range? Open up my PF over calling range. Is open limping +EV with 4 or 5 probable callers behind?

Any broad suggestions appreciated as I haven't seen tables like this online since Party was facing the US.
"I am THE MASTER at pushing into hands slightly better than mine." -DTheater
User avatar
woodyman4916
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Jan 15 2006
Location: Upstate NY
  • YIM
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby Misunderstud » Apr 23 2011

First thing I'd do is buy a bigger wallet. :)

You don't really have to adjust your game as such - the table conditions will mean that you'll end up playing more hands automatically. Open limping sometimes becomes viable, yes, but don't overdo it. Bluff less; steal less; value bet more; call down more, don't get fancy. Remember that sitting at a table of fish doesn't give you a divine right to win - just to get drawn out on more often. (But they'll also pay you off when you hit, which more than makes up for it.) Don't join 'em, beat 'em.
Learn from your mistakes; earn from other people's
User avatar
Misunderstud
Limited Ability
 
Posts: 2479
Joined: Jan 10 2006
Location: Here, stupid
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby woodyman4916 » Apr 23 2011

Misunderstud wrote:Remember that sitting at a table of fish doesn't give you a divine right to win.



They remind me from time to time :lol:
"I am THE MASTER at pushing into hands slightly better than mine." -DTheater
User avatar
woodyman4916
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Jan 15 2006
Location: Upstate NY
  • YIM
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby kinnipak » Apr 25 2011

Misunderstud wrote: Bluff less; steal less; value bet more; call down more, don't get fancy.


I might just get this tattooed someplace where I can always see it....
Poker is a test of your skill against your opponents luck.
User avatar
kinnipak
Polar Express
 
Posts: 2782
Joined: Jun 11 2005
Location: U.S. ONLINE POKER HOSTAGE
  • E-mail kinnipak
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby thew92 » Apr 26 2011

woodyman4916 wrote:After fighting with the Russian TAGs and 15/12 BOTs on Stars for 80k hands at .5/1 and 1/2, I find myself having to make a big adjustment to Lock Poker. Any obvious adjustments? I find myself lost. 5 limpers per pot! Hell open limping at most Stars tables was exstinct. Should I narrow my MP PFR range? Open up my PF over calling range. Is open limping +EV with 4 or 5 probable callers behind?

Any broad suggestions appreciated as I haven't seen tables like this online since Party was facing the US.


1st you where practicing poor table selection at Stars if that was the type of players you where playing against. Now on merge you limited to the games available so just be happy the ones you are in are soft as of now.

Open Limping is never good. *Disclaimer I play 6 max.

So far I have discovered that the merge network tables are a little softer than the avg. Stars table. (I would never play in the "avg" Stars game) But over the past few day I have noticed that they are filling up with the old Stars regs.

My biggest problem with Merge is there dam "rake pile" looks just like the button.
http://www.facebook.com/TexasPPA
User avatar
thew92
PPA Big Wheel
 
Posts: 1589
Joined: Jul 27 2005
Location: Texas
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby woodyman4916 » Apr 26 2011

thew92 wrote:
woodyman4916 wrote:After fighting with the Russian TAGs and 15/12 BOTs on Stars for 80k hands at .5/1 and 1/2, I find myself having to make a big adjustment to Lock Poker. Any obvious adjustments? I find myself lost. 5 limpers per pot! Hell open limping at most Stars tables was exstinct. Should I narrow my MP PFR range? Open up my PF over calling range. Is open limping +EV with 4 or 5 probable callers behind?

Any broad suggestions appreciated as I haven't seen tables like this online since Party was facing the US.


1st you where practicing poor table selection at Stars if that was the type of players you where playing against. Now on merge you limited to the games available so just be happy the ones you are in are soft as of now.

Open Limping is never good. *Disclaimer I play 6 max.

So far I have discovered that the merge network tables are a little softer than the avg. Stars table. (I would never play in the "avg" Stars game) But over the past few day I have noticed that they are filling up with the old Stars regs.

My biggest problem with Merge is there dam "rake pile" looks just like the button.



Try finding a 1/2 FR limit table on Stars with more than 27% players to the flop especially with the regs 12 tabling, unless it's a weekend. I do wish Merg software was a little cleaner. I find it hard to play more than two tables.
"I am THE MASTER at pushing into hands slightly better than mine." -DTheater
User avatar
woodyman4916
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Jan 15 2006
Location: Upstate NY
  • YIM
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby thew92 » Apr 26 2011

Try finding a 1/2 FR limit table on Stars with more than 27% players to the flop especially with the regs 12 tabling, unless it's a weekend. I do wish Merg software was a little cleaner. I find it hard to play more than two tables.


I was playing 6 tables at a time at Stars and never was I at a table without at least one 60+ VPIP player. Of course that was at 6max It's been a really long time since I play FR. Yeah merge needs to step up their software soon. At least give a better sound when you about to time out. Or maybe I just need to get used to it. So far it seems like they are going to be the biggest benefactor in "Black Friday" at least in the short run.

The biggest thing I am going to miss is that I put a lot of time and effort in table selection and now I just have to play in whatever is available instead of having 40 tables to choose form like I did on Stars.
http://www.facebook.com/TexasPPA
User avatar
thew92
PPA Big Wheel
 
Posts: 1589
Joined: Jul 27 2005
Location: Texas
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby woodyman4916 » Apr 26 2011

thew92 wrote:I was playing 6 tables at a time at Stars and never was I at a table without at least one 60+ VPIP player.


You might see this once every other day and once a week the 70/40 guy from Belarus who loved to stack off or double in 30 minutes. The exploitable players were the 27/4 guys who were mostly fit or fold post flop and I think I had a slight edge on the 15/13 "BOTS" as they would never float a flop HU.

(I didn't know there was a Belarus until recently. Yikes! What does that say about me?)
"I am THE MASTER at pushing into hands slightly better than mine." -DTheater
User avatar
woodyman4916
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Jan 15 2006
Location: Upstate NY
  • YIM
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby jeffnc » May 11 2011

Play good starting hands and play them well for value relative to your opponents. Always raise and cap premium pairs from any position and play them strongly after the flop. Fold them if it's obvious you're beat, but prefer to see a showdown with them if possible. Do not raise lower pocket pairs for set value in any position - pocket pairs want low preflop cost, and aggressive postflop action. Fold weak unsuited broadway hands in early position. Cautiously play weak broadway hands in late position. Raise strong multiway hands in late position in multiway limped pots, basically because on average this is a stronger hand than your opponents are playing. e.g. KJs, T9s, ATs. KQo is a raisable hand in middle position after a couple limpers, but don't turn into an aggro donkey just because your opponents are playing weak hands. Raising KTo just gives up your advantage to them (open raising in the cutoff is different of course, but presumably the point here is we don't get to open raise on the CO very often.) Put in lots of money on the flop with top draws, and never slowplay sets or 2 pair hands. Always play hands like TT on a flop of :qc :tc :9h very strongly.
User avatar
jeffnc
Mason's Favorite
 
Posts: 7621
Joined: Jan 13 2004
Location: NC, USA
Top

Re: Adjusting to the horrible play at Merge site

Postby Piscivorous » Jun 02 2011

I'm seriously thinking of writing some articles on Bingo for my poker blog. Bingo is the term I use for the lowest [and sometimes two lowest] limits played in B&M casinos. Usually $2/$4 and $3/$6, but sometimes even $4/$8 and $6/$12. I've seen $1/$2 LHE locally on the weekend, but won't go near it. It is even seen online at the micro limits on some sites, but lately I've seen it as high as $1/$2 on Merge. I've been playing a lot of this at my local B&Ms this year [and especially after Black Friday] and it rarely differs from house to house. 6 or more players to a flop. Rare raises preflop. Players chasing dreams and little else.

It is Limit Holdem, but such a radical departure from what we are used to online, that I think it really is a topic that needs to be discussed. I haven't played much cash outside California or Reno. It may be a geographic thing, but I don't think so. My limited play in The Trump Taj Mahal and at the casinos down in Tunica suggest this isn't a localized occurrence at the lowest limits. I do, however, believe that there is probably better play in Vegas. I only say that because there is a better likelihood that you'll have a few decent players at your table there looking to cash in on the tourists. The locals in Reno really suck, so it is a bad comparison with Vegas.

It departs so much from good TAG play online, that I think it would be a great topic. I'll probably post some questions here as I get busy researching and writing.
Harold Camping was wrong. The world ended on April 15th, 2011.
User avatar
Piscivorous
L'il Slice of Heaven
 
Posts: 6131
Joined: May 06 2004
Location: US Online Poker Hostage
Top

Post a reply
10 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Limit Hold'em

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours
  • News News
  • Site map Site map
  • SitemapIndex SitemapIndex
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Facebook connect for phpBB by SVmods.

phpBB SEO
Time : 0.109s | 12 Queries | GZIP : On
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
Advertisements by Advertisement Management